Design and Technology KS1 Y1Y2 Convention

Freestanding Structures

4 lessons

Subject
Design and Technology
Key Stage
KS1
Year group
Y1, Y2
Statutory reference
build structures, exploring how they can be made stronger, stiffer and more stable
Source document
Design and Technology (KS1/KS2) - National Curriculum Programme of Study
Estimated duration
4 lessons
Status
Convention
Coverage: 8/11 expected capabilities surfaced
Curriculum anchorConcept modelDifferentiation dataThinking lensLesson structureVocabulary definitionsPrior knowledge linksLearner scaffolding
Cross-curricular linksSuccess criteriaAccess and inclusion

Concepts

This study delivers 1 primary concept and 2 secondary concepts.

Primary concept: Structures and Stability (DT-KS1-C004)

Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 1/6

Structures are physical constructions that support loads or maintain a form. At KS1, pupils explore how structures can be made stronger, stiffer and more stable through practical building activities. They investigate how the shape of a structure, the way it is joined and the materials it is made from all affect its strength and stability. This concept introduces foundational engineering principles through hands-on investigation.

Teaching guidance: Set building challenges using reclaimed materials, construction kits and card. Investigate how tubes, triangles and other shapes resist bending. Explore different joining methods including adhesives, tape, folding tabs and fasteners. Challenge pupils to make a structure that can support a specific load - a bridge that holds toy cars, a tower that holds a book. Use questions to prompt investigation: 'What happens if you make the legs wider?', 'Which shape is stronger - a square or a triangle?' Key vocabulary: structure, strong, stable, stiff, rigid, weak, collapse, support, load, base, joint, brace, triangle, beam Common misconceptions: Pupils often attribute strength to the amount of material used rather than to structure and shape. Demonstrating that a triangulated structure is stronger than a square one with the same materials addresses this. Some pupils may not understand that stability is about balance and the distribution of weight as well as strength of materials.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeExample taskCommon errors

EntryBuilding a simple freestanding structure from given materials, exploring how to stop it falling over.Use these cardboard tubes and tape to build a tower that stands up on its own.Building a tall, narrow structure that immediately falls over; Using excessive tape or glue instead of thinking about the structure's shape
DevelopingExplaining why some structures are stronger than others and using shapes like triangles to add strength.Make a bridge from paper that can hold a toy car. How can you make the paper stronger?Believing thicker material is always stronger, without considering shape; Not understanding why folding or triangulating makes structures stronger
ExpectedDesigning and building a structure that meets a specific brief, explaining how the shape, materials and joining methods contribute to its strength and stability.Design and build a shelter for a toy animal that is at least 15cm tall and can support a book placed on top.Building without considering load-bearing requirements; Not being able to explain why their design choices contribute to strength

Model response (Entry): I stood three tubes up and taped them together. Then I spread them out at the bottom so it didn't wobble.
Model response (Developing): I folded the paper into a zigzag shape, like a concertina. This made it much stiffer than a flat piece of paper. The folds act like little walls that stop the paper bending.
Model response (Expected): I made four corner pillars from rolled newspaper tubes because tubes are stronger than flat paper. I used triangular braces between the pillars to stop them leaning. The roof is corrugated card for stiffness. It is 18cm tall and held the book. The triangles and tubes make it strong even though the materials are light.

Secondary concept: Materials and Their Characteristics (DT-KS1-C003)

Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 1/6

Different materials have different physical properties that make them suitable for different purposes. At KS1, pupils learn to identify and describe the properties of a range of materials including construction materials such as card, wood and plastic, textiles and food ingredients, and to make informed choices about which material to use based on what the product needs to do.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryIdentifying different materials by name (card, fabric, wood, plastic) and describing one property of each.Not knowing the names of common materials; Describing only how materials look, not how they feel or behave
DevelopingChoosing a material for a specific purpose and explaining why it is suitable based on its properties.Choosing materials based on colour preference rather than functional properties; Not being able to explain why a material is or isn't suitable
ExpectedComparing materials systematically and selecting the most appropriate one by weighing up multiple properties against design criteria.Considering only one property instead of weighing up several; Not recognising that the 'best' material depends on the specific requirements

Secondary concept: Product Analysis and Evaluation (DT-KS1-C010)

Type: Process | Teaching weight: 1/6

Product analysis involves examining an existing product to understand its purpose, how it works, what it is made from and how well it achieves its intended function. At KS1, pupils develop the habit of looking critically at products, both those made by others and those they have made themselves, asking structured questions about purpose, materials, function and user. Evaluation against design criteria develops the principle that a product's success can be measured objectively rather than assessed through preference alone.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryLooking at a product and saying what they like or do not like about it, using simple language.Giving only a personal preference without any reasoning; Not being able to articulate what makes the product effective
DevelopingAnalysing a product by considering its purpose, materials, user and how well it works, using guided questions.Evaluating only the appearance and not the function; Not considering the user's needs when analysing the product
ExpectedEvaluating their own product and products made by others against design criteria, identifying strengths, weaknesses and specific improvements.Saying everything is perfect without identifying genuine areas for improvement; Suggesting improvements that are unrelated to the design criteria


Thinking lens: Structure and Function (primary)

Key question: How does the structure of this thing enable or explain what it does? Why this lens fits: Investigating existing products involves disassembly thinking: pupils examine how the structure and materials of an existing product enable it to perform its function, making structure-function reasoning the primary analytical tool. Question stems for KS1:
  • What shape is it? Why do you think it is that shape?
  • What job does this part do?
  • What would happen if this part were a different shape?
  • Can you find something else that does the same job?
  • Secondary lens: Evidence and Argument — Evaluating whether a product meets its design criteria requires pupils to form a judgement supported by evidence from investigation or testing — the evaluative act is a structured argument from evidence to conclusion.

    Session structure: Design, Make, Evaluate

    Design, Make, Evaluate

    The core Design & Technology cycle. Pupils investigate existing products and user needs, design a solution with clear specifications, plan the making process, construct using appropriate materials and techniques, test against the design brief, and evaluate the outcome with suggestions for improvement.

    investigatedesignplanmaketestevaluate Assessment: Design portfolio including investigation findings, annotated design with specifications, making log, test results, and evaluative conclusion comparing outcome to original brief. Teacher note: Use the DESIGN, MAKE AND EVALUATE template: show children existing products and help them say what they like and how they work. Support them in drawing and talking about their own design idea. Help them choose materials and make their product with adult support. Encourage them to try it out and say what worked and what they might change. KS1 question stems:
  • What do you like about this product? How does it work?
  • Can you draw what you want to make?
  • What materials will you use? Why?
  • Does your product work? What would you change?

  • Design and Technology: Structures

    Design brief: Design and build a freestanding tower using card, paper, and tape. The tower must be at least 30cm tall and strong enough to hold a small toy on top. Materials: card, paper, tape, straws, newspaper Tools: scissors, ruler, pencil Techniques: folding for strength, tube rolling, triangulation, base widening, tab joining Safety notes: Ensure stable work surfaces. If using newspaper tubes, supervise rolling to avoid paper cuts. All scissors should be child-safe rounded-end type. Evaluation criteria:
  • Does the tower stand without support?
  • Is it at least 30cm tall?
  • Can it hold a small toy on top?
  • What makes it strong?

  • Why this study matters

    Building a structure that stands up without support is a fundamental engineering challenge. Pupils discover through trial and error that a wide base is more stable, that triangles are stronger than squares, and that rolling paper into tubes makes it stiffer. The process of testing and improving teaches the iterative design cycle through direct physical feedback -- it stands or it falls.


    Pitfalls to avoid

  • Building too tall too quickly -- the structure collapses before joints dry
  • Using only glue for joints -- teach folding tabs and slotting as structural joins
  • Not testing with a load -- a structure that stands is not the same as one that holds something

  • Vocabulary word mat

    TermMeaning

    absorbentA material property describing the ability to soak up and hold liquid within its structure.
    analyseTo examine a product or design carefully, identifying its features, materials, and how well it works for its purpose.
    assess
    base
    beam
    braceA structural support added to strengthen a joint or frame and prevent it from bending or collapsing.
    card
    characteristic
    collapse
    compare
    criteriaA set of standards or requirements that a design must meet to be successful for its intended purpose.
    criterion
    evaluateTo judge how well a finished product meets the original design criteria and suggest improvements.
    fabricA flexible material made by weaving, knitting, or felting fibres together, used in textiles and sewing.
    flexibleA material property describing the ability to bend easily without breaking or snapping.
    fragile
    functionThe job or purpose that a product is designed to do, such as holding, moving, or protecting something.
    improveTo make changes to a design or product so that it works better, looks better, or better meets the design criteria.
    ingredientA single food item that is combined with others to make a dish or food product.
    joint
    load
    materialAny substance from which a product can be made, such as wood, card, fabric, plastic, or metal.
    opinion
    plastic
    productThe finished item that has been designed and made for a specific purpose and user.
    property
    purposeThe reason why a product exists and what it is intended to do for its user.
    rigidA material property meaning stiff and unable to bend or flex; it holds its shape firmly.
    rough
    smooth
    stableA structure that is firmly balanced and does not easily topple, wobble, or collapse.
    stiffA material property meaning resistant to bending; not easily flexed or folded.
    strength
    strong
    structureSomething that has been built from parts arranged in a particular way to support weight or serve a purpose.
    suitableAppropriate or right for a particular purpose, user, or situation.
    support
    triangle
    userThe person who will use the finished product; designs should be made with the user needs in mind.
    waterproofA material property meaning that water cannot pass through it, keeping the contents dry.
    weak
    weakness
    wood

    Prior knowledge (retrieval plan)

    Pupils should already know the following from earlier units:

    Prior knowledge neededFor conceptDescription

    Iterative Design ProcessStructures and StabilityThe iterative design process involves cyclical stages of designing, making and evaluating, where ...
    Design CriteriaProduct Analysis and EvaluationDesign criteria are the specific requirements that a product must meet to be considered successfu...
    Joining and Finishing TechniquesProduct Analysis and EvaluationJoining techniques are methods used to connect materials and components together so that a produc...


    Scaffolding and inclusion (Y1)

    GuidelineDetail

    Reading levelPre-reader / Emergent
    Text-to-speechRequired
    Max sentence length8 words
    VocabularyConcrete nouns and action verbs only. No abstract concepts without physical anchor. Examples: dog, apple, jump, big, one more.
    Scaffolding levelMaximum
    Hint tiers2 tiers
    Session length5–12 minutes
    Worked examplesRequired — Animated, narrated walkthrough with no text. Character models the thinking aloud.
    Feedback toneWarm Nurturing
    Normalize struggleYes
    Example correct feedbackThe frog jumped exactly four spaces — you counted perfectly!
    Example error feedbackOh, let us count again together! [animation demonstrates]


    Knowledge organiser

    Key terms:
  • structure
  • stable
  • strong
  • stiff
  • base
  • joint
  • brace
  • triangle
  • load
  • Core facts (expected standard):
  • Structures and Stability: Designing and building a structure that meets a specific brief, explaining how the shape, materials and joining methods contribute to its strength and stability.

  • Graph context

    Node type: DTTopicSuggestion | Study ID: TS-DT-KS1-002 Concept IDs:
  • DT-KS1-C004: Structures and Stability (primary)
  • DT-KS1-C003: Materials and Their Characteristics
  • DT-KS1-C010: Product Analysis and Evaluation
  • Cypher query:

    ``cypher

    MATCH (ts:DTTopicSuggestion {suggestion_id: 'TS-DT-KS1-002'})

    -[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)

    -[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)

    RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description

    ``


    Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.