English KS2 Y5 Genre Study Exemplar

Persuasion and Discussion: Balanced Argument

Subject
English
Key Stage
KS2
Year group
Y5
Statutory reference
Writing - Composition (Y5-6): identifying the audience for and purpose of the writing
Source document
English (KS1/KS2) - National Curriculum Programme of Study
Study type
Genre Study
Status
Exemplar
Coverage: 10/13 expected capabilities surfaced
Curriculum anchorConcept modelDifferentiation dataThinking lensLesson structureSubject referencesVocabulary definitionsPrior knowledge linksAssessment alignmentLearner scaffolding
Cross-curricular linksSuccess criteriaAccess and inclusion
Study type: Genre Study | Status: Exemplar

Concepts

This study delivers 1 primary concept and 4 secondary concepts.

Primary concept: Audience, purpose and form in writing (EN-Y5-C026)

Type: Process | Teaching weight: 4/6

At upper KS2, pupils plan writing by explicitly identifying the intended audience, the purpose of the writing and the most appropriate form to achieve that purpose, selecting from a range of text types used as models. Mastery means pupils make conscious choices about form and language that reflect genuine awareness of audience and purpose, not simply genre conventions applied mechanically.

Teaching guidance: Before all extended writing tasks, require pupils to articulate audience and purpose explicitly: Who is this for? What is it trying to do? What form is most appropriate? Provide model texts for each form studied. Return to audience and purpose when evaluating and editing — 'Does this achieve its purpose for its audience?' Key vocabulary: audience, purpose, form, genre, register, style, model text, context Common misconceptions: Pupils often treat 'audience' as a mechanical box to tick rather than a genuine influence on their writing choices. They may choose form based on what they find easiest rather than what is most effective for the purpose.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeExample taskCommon errors

EntryIdentifying who a piece of writing is for and what it is trying to do when given clear examples.Look at these two texts: a letter to a friend and a letter to the headteacher. Who is the audience for each? What is the purpose of each?Describing what the text says rather than who it is for and what it is trying to do; Not understanding that audience and purpose affect the language choices
DevelopingIdentifying audience, purpose and form before writing, and making some deliberate language choices that reflect this awareness.You need to write about why your school should get a new playground. Your teacher gives you two options: a persuasive letter to the local council, or a poster for the school noticeboard. Which form would you choose and why? How would the language differ?Choosing a form without explaining why it suits the purpose; Using the same register regardless of audience
ExpectedConsistently identifying audience, purpose and form before writing, selecting appropriate forms using other writing as models, and making conscious language and structural choices throughout the writing process.Write the opening paragraph of a newspaper report about a local event AND the opening of a diary entry about the same event. Explain how audience and purpose changed your choices.Writing in the correct form but not varying the language to reflect the different audiences; Treating audience as a box to tick rather than a genuine influence on every language choice
Greater DepthAdapting writing flexibly for different audiences and purposes within the same piece, and evaluating how published writers make audience and purpose choices.A charity wants to raise money for clean water in developing countries. They need three texts: a fundraising letter to parents, a fact sheet for children, and a social media post. Write the opening of each and explain how you adapted your choices.Using the same tone and register across all three versions; Not explaining the specific choices made for each audience

Model response (Entry): The letter to a friend is for someone I know well. Its purpose is to share news in a chatty way. The letter to the headteacher is for an adult in authority. Its purpose is to request something politely.
Model response (Developing): I would choose the letter to the council because it can include detailed arguments. The language would be formal and polite because I am writing to adults in authority. I would use phrases like 'I am writing to request' and give evidence for my points. A poster would need to be short, eye-catching and use simpler language because it is for a quick glance, not a careful read.
Model response (Expected): Newspaper: 'Hundreds of residents gathered in Victoria Park on Saturday for the annual Summer Fair, which raised over two thousand pounds for the local hospital.' Diary: 'What an amazing day! The Summer Fair was brilliant. Mum let me go on the bouncy castle three times and I won a goldfish.' In the newspaper report I used third person, formal language and the most important fact first because the audience is the general public and the purpose is to inform. In the diary I used first person, informal language and personal feelings because the audience is myself and the purpose is to record my experience.
Model response (Greater Depth): Parent letter: 'Dear Parent/Carer, Every child deserves access to clean drinking water. Your donation of just five pounds could provide safe water for a family for a month.' Child fact sheet: 'Did you know? 1 in 10 people around the world do not have clean water to drink. That is like 3 children in every class having no safe water at home.' Social media: 'Clean water changes everything. Five pounds. One family. One month. Donate now.' Each adapts to its audience: formal and emotional for parents, accessible and relatable for children, punchy and shareable for social media. The purpose is the same (fundraising) but the form, register and techniques change completely.

Secondary concept: Cohesive devices and paragraph linking (EN-Y5-C025)

Type: Skill | Teaching weight: 4/6

Cohesive devices are words and phrases that connect ideas within and across paragraphs, creating a coherent, unified text. At Year 5, these include devices within paragraphs (then, after that, this, firstly) and linking adverbials across paragraphs referring to time (later), place (nearby) and number (secondly), as well as tense choices that signal temporal relationships. Mastery means pupils deploy a wide range of these devices deliberately and appropriately.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryUsing basic time connectives (then, next, after that) to link ideas within a paragraph.Using 'then' repeatedly as the only linking word; Joining all sentences with 'and' without varying the connective
DevelopingUsing a range of cohesive devices within paragraphs (then, after that, this, firstly) and beginning to link paragraphs using adverbials of time, place or number.Using only time connectives without varying with place or manner; Starting a new paragraph without any link to the previous one
ExpectedDeploying a wide range of cohesive devices deliberately and appropriately, organised by function (time, place, number, addition, contrast, consequence), to build coherent, well-structured texts.Using cohesive devices that do not match the logical relationship (writing 'however' when 'therefore' is needed); Inserting devices mechanically without ensuring they genuinely connect the ideas
Greater DepthUsing cohesive devices with subtlety and variety, including pronoun references, synonyms, and tense choices as well as adverbials, to create seamless, professional-sounding prose.Identifying problems but not being able to articulate why the revision is better; Over-correcting by removing all repetition, making the text unclear about what 'they' or 'this' refers to

Secondary concept: Modal verbs (EN-Y5-C029)

Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 3/6

Modal verbs (might, should, will, must, can, could, would, may, shall, ought to) express degrees of possibility, necessity, certainty or permission. At upper KS2 mastery, pupils use modal verbs purposefully to indicate degrees of certainty in writing, understand that modal verbs are followed by an infinitive without 'to', and can discuss the effect of choosing one modal verb over another. This is Year 5-specific grammar in Appendix 2.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryRecognising common modal verbs (can, will, might, must) and understanding that they express possibility or certainty.Treating all modal verbs as meaning the same thing; Not understanding that 'must' expresses strong obligation or certainty, not just emphasis
DevelopingUsing modal verbs to express different degrees of possibility in writing and explaining how changing the modal changes the meaning.Using 'can' and 'could' interchangeably without recognising the difference in certainty; Writing 'should of' instead of 'should have'
ExpectedUsing modal verbs purposefully in writing to indicate degrees of possibility, necessity or certainty, and understanding how modal choice affects register and meaning.Using only 'will' and 'can' without exploring the full range of modals; Not recognising that modal verbs are essential in science and non-fiction writing for hedging claims
Greater DepthSelecting modal verbs with precision to control tone and register, combining modals with adverbs to fine-tune degrees of possibility, and identifying how modal choice affects persuasion.Analysing the meaning of the modals but not discussing the power dynamics they create; Not recognising that modal choice is a key tool for controlling register in formal writing

Secondary concept: Passive voice (EN-Y5-C030)

Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 5/6

The passive voice occurs when the grammatical subject of a verb receives the action rather than performing it (e.g., 'The window was broken by Tom' rather than 'Tom broke the window'). At upper KS2 mastery, pupils can construct passive sentences, identify them in texts, and understand when and why writers choose the passive — particularly to change focus, to omit the agent, or to create an impersonal, formal tone.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryUnderstanding that a sentence can be written in two ways: active (the subject does the action) and passive (the subject receives the action), with teacher modelling.Thinking the two sentences have different meanings rather than different emphasis; Not noticing the structural change (subject and object have swapped position)
DevelopingConverting simple active sentences into passive and identifying the passive construction ('be' + past participle), noting that the agent ('by...') is optional.Forgetting to use the correct form of 'be' (was/were) before the past participle; Including the agent when it would be better omitted
ExpectedUsing passive voice purposefully in writing, understanding when and why writers choose passive over active (to change focus, omit the agent, or create a formal tone), and identifying passive constructions in texts.Confusing past tense with passive voice (thinking 'I heated' is passive because it is past tense); Using passive in all writing once learned, without selecting it purposefully
Greater DepthAnalysing how published writers and public figures use passive voice strategically, including to avoid responsibility or create deliberate ambiguity.Recognising the grammatical difference but not analysing the rhetorical purpose; Assuming passive voice is always bad writing rather than understanding it as a strategic choice

Secondary concept: Public speaking and formal debate (EN-Y5-C035)

Type: Skill | Teaching weight: 4/6

In Years 5 and 6, pupils' confidence, enjoyment and mastery of language should be extended through public speaking, performance and debate. At upper KS2 mastery, pupils can give structured spoken presentations, argue a position in formal debate, use notes purposefully, maintain focus on a topic, and evaluate different viewpoints, building on others' contributions courteously.

Differentiation

LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

EntryContributing a spoken point or opinion in a whole-class or small-group discussion, with some structure provided by the teacher.Stating an opinion without giving any reason; Speaking too quietly for the group to hear
DevelopingGiving a short spoken presentation using notes as prompts, and beginning to respond to others' points in discussion.Reading a prepared script word for word rather than speaking from notes; Not responding to the question and instead repeating part of the prepared talk
ExpectedGiving structured formal presentations and participating in debates with proposition, opposition and rebuttal, maintaining focus on the topic, using notes where necessary, and evaluating different viewpoints courteously.Repeating the same point more loudly rather than addressing the opposing argument; Confusing personal feelings with structured argument
Greater DepthLeading and managing formal discussions, evaluating the strength of arguments (including their own), adapting register for formal contexts, and using rhetorical techniques to persuade.Showing bias towards one side when chairing rather than maintaining neutrality; Summing up by choosing the side they agree with rather than evaluating argument quality


Thinking lens: Evidence and Argument (primary)

Key question: What is the evidence, how reliable is it, and what conclusions can it support? Why this lens fits: Formal debate is a structured form of evidence-based argumentation — pupils must construct claims, anticipate counter-arguments, and deploy evidence in real time to persuade an audience. Question stems for KS2:
  • What evidence supports this claim?
  • Is this a fact or an opinion? How can you tell?
  • Is this strong evidence or weak evidence? Why?
  • Can you structure your argument: claim, evidence, reasoning?
  • Secondary lens: Structure and Function — Deliberate authorial choices about character, setting, atmosphere and dialogue are structure-function decisions — pupils learn how each element contributes to the narrative's effect, asking 'what does this do for the reader?'

    Session structure: Discussion and Debate

    Discussion and Debate

    A structured sequence for exploring contested issues or multiple perspectives. Begins with a stimulus that raises a question or dilemma, builds knowledge through research, develops arguments through structured discussion techniques, captures thinking in writing, and reflects on how views may have changed.

    stimulusresearchstructured_discussionwritingreflection Assessment: Balanced written argument or persuasive piece demonstrating understanding of multiple perspectives, supported by evidence, with a reasoned personal conclusion. Teacher note: Use the DISCUSSION AND DEBATE template: present a clear stimulus such as a statement, image, or short text that prompts different viewpoints. Give pupils time to research or gather evidence for their position. Use a structured discussion format with clear rules for listening and responding. Guide them to write up their view with reasons and evidence. KS2 question stems:
  • What do you think about this? Why?
  • Can you give a reason for your opinion?
  • What might someone who disagrees say?
  • Can you write down your view with your best reason?

  • Text type and features

    Text type: Non Fiction Features to teach: formal academic register, cohesive devices linking paragraphs, hedging language (may, could, tends to), evidence-based argumentation, counter-argument and rebuttal Writing outcome: Write an extended balanced argument (500-700 words) on a topical issue with evidence from multiple sources, formal register, and a nuanced conclusion Grammar focus: modal verbs for hedging, cohesive devices across paragraphs, passive voice for formality (from Y5 Appendix 2) Literary terms: register, hedging, modal verb, passive voice, cohesion, evidence

    Suggested texts

  • Model discussion texts (teacher-curated) by Various — Exemplars with annotated cohesive devices and hedging language
  • First News / The Week Junior articles by Various — Age-appropriate news articles presenting multiple viewpoints

  • Genre

  • Persuasion: Texts that argue a single point of view using rhetorical and emotional techniques to convince the reader. Distinct from discussion (which is balanced): persuasion is deliberately one-sided. Teaches pupils to identify and deploy techniques including rhetorical questions, emotive language, repetition, and direct address.
  • Discussion: Texts that present multiple viewpoints on a debatable issue, reaching a justified conclusion. More demanding than persuasion because pupils must hold two opposing positions in mind simultaneously and treat both fairly. Often paired with spoken language (debate) to develop oracy alongside writing.

  • Why this study matters

    At Y5, discussion writing becomes more analytically demanding. Pupils must move beyond simple for/against to acknowledge complexity, use hedging language (may, could, tends to), and build cohesion across paragraphs. The formal debate component develops the spoken language competence needed for secondary school. Modal verbs and passive voice are statutory Y5 grammar and fit naturally into academic register.


    Pitfalls to avoid

  • Arguments are still binary (for/against) without acknowledging nuance or complexity
  • Modal verbs and passive voice used because the teacher says so, not because the register demands them
  • Conclusion simply repeats the strongest argument rather than genuinely weighing the evidence

  • Reading and writing skills (KS2)

    These disciplinary skills should be woven through teaching, not taught in isolation:

  • Analysing vocabulary choices and their effects — Analyse how authors select and deploy vocabulary for effect, examining connotation, register, etymology and ambiguity, and evaluating how these choices position the reader or shape the meaning of the text.
  • Language choices and their effects — Identify and explain how the author's choice of specific words and phrases enhances or shapes meaning, considering the connotations, imagery and deliberate effects created by those linguistic choices.
  • Evaluating and synthesising information across a text — Retrieve, select and evaluate information and evidence from across extended and complex texts, synthesising material from different sections to construct a coherent and comprehensive response.
  • Noticing interesting words and phrases — Identify and discuss words and phrases that capture attention or create an effect, beginning to explain what makes them interesting, surprising or effective in the context of the text.
  • Retrieval of information and key details — Retrieve and record specific information and key details from both fiction and non-fiction texts, locating relevant sections and selecting the precise evidence required to answer a question.
  • Inference with textual evidence — Make inferences about characters, events, settings and authorial viewpoint that go beyond what is stated explicitly, and justify those inferences by citing evidence from the text.

  • Vocabulary word mat

    TermMeaning

    active voiceA sentence construction where the subject performs the action (e.g. 'The cat chased the mouse').
    adverbialA word, phrase, or clause that works like an adverb, telling when, where, how, or why something happened.
    agentIn grammar, the person or thing performing the action in a sentence.
    argumentA set of reasons and evidence used to support a viewpoint or persuade the reader.
    audience
    certaintyThe degree to which something is sure to happen, expressed through modal verbs and adverbs.
    cohesionThe way ideas in a text are linked together using connectives, pronouns, and repeated words.
    cohesive deviceA word or technique that links ideas within and between sentences and paragraphs (e.g. connectives, pronouns, repetition).
    contextThe surrounding words, sentences, or situation that help clarify the meaning of a word or text.
    contrast
    couldA modal verb expressing possibility, ability in the past, or polite requests.
    debateA structured discussion where different viewpoints are argued with evidence and reasoning.
    form
    formal
    formal presentationA spoken performance delivered to an audience with prepared content, clear structure, and appropriate register.
    genreA category or type of text with shared features and conventions (e.g. adventure, myth, report, diary).
    impersonalWriting that avoids personal pronouns (I, you) and presents information objectively.
    linking phraseA phrase used to connect ideas between sentences or paragraphs (e.g. 'on the other hand', 'as a result').
    mayA modal verb expressing possibility or permission.
    mightA modal verb expressing a lower degree of possibility than 'may'.
    modal verbA verb used before another verb to show possibility, necessity, ability, or permission (can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would).
    model text
    mustA modal verb expressing strong obligation or certainty.
    necessitySomething that is essential or required; expressed through modal verbs like 'must' and 'need to'.
    number
    objectThe noun or pronoun in a sentence that receives the action of the verb.
    oppositionA contrasting or opposing argument, viewpoint, or force in a text.
    paragraph
    passive voiceA sentence construction where the subject receives the action: 'The cake was eaten' rather than 'She ate the cake'.
    past participle
    permissionAuthorisation to do something, expressed through modal verbs like 'may' and 'can'.
    place
    possibilitySomething that may or may not happen; expressed through modal verbs (might, could, may).
    propositionA statement or idea put forward for discussion or as the basis of an argument.
    public speakingThe skill of delivering speeches or presentations to an audience with clarity, confidence, and appropriate register.
    purpose
    rebuttalAn argument or evidence presented to counter or disprove an opposing point.
    register
    sequence
    shouldA modal verb expressing advice, obligation, or expectation.
    styleA writer's distinctive way of using language, including vocabulary, sentence structure, and tone.
    subjectThe noun or pronoun that performs the action of the verb in a sentence.
    time
    viewpoint
    willA modal verb expressing certainty about the future, willingness, or promises.
    wouldA modal verb expressing hypothetical situations, habits in the past, or polite requests.
    balanced argument
    evidence
    hedging
    nuance
    perspective

    Prior knowledge (retrieval plan)

    Pupils should already know the following from earlier units:

    Prior knowledge neededFor conceptDescription

    Exception words (Years 3-4)Public speaking and formal debatePupils read further exception words from the Years 3-4 statutory list, noting the unusual corresp...
    Reading for different purposes and structuresAudience, purpose and form in writingPupils read books structured in different ways and read for a range of purposes including pleasur...
    Themes and conventions in booksCohesive devices and paragraph linkingPupils identify themes and conventions in a wide range of books, recognising recurring themes in ...
    Comprehension monitoringPassive voicePupils check that text makes sense to them, discussing their understanding and explaining the mea...
    Drawing inferences with evidenceModal verbsPupils draw inferences such as inferring characters' feelings, thoughts and motives from their ac...


    Assessment alignment (KS2)

    KS2 test framework content domain codes assessed by this study:

    CodeDescriptionAssesses concept

    CDC-KS2-GPS-G1_6Adverbs – the use of –ly in Standard English to turn adjectives into adverbs; expressing time, place and cause using adverbs; indicating degrees of possibilityModal verbs
    CDC-KS2-GPS-G4_1cModal verbs – indicating degrees of possibility using modal verbsModal verbs
    CDC-KS2-GPS-G4_4Passive and active – use of the passive to affect the presentation of information in a sentencePassive voice


    Scaffolding and inclusion (Y5)

    GuidelineDetail

    Reading levelFluent Reader (Lexile 450–650)
    Text-to-speechAvailable
    Max sentence length22 words
    VocabularyAcademic vocabulary expected. Technical domain vocabulary accessible with in-context clues. Figurative language (metaphor, personification) appropriate.
    Scaffolding levelLight To Moderate
    Hint tiers4 tiers
    Session length20–30 minutes
    Worked examplesRequired — Text-based. Child completes partial worked examples (fading). Not fully narrated.
    Feedback tonePeer Like Respectful
    Normalize struggleYes
    Example correct feedbackYou recognised that 1/2 is larger than 2/5, and used the common denominator method correctly. The visualiser confirms it — the bar for 1/2 is noticeably longer.
    Example error feedbackThe reasoning does not quite hold: you said both fractions are the same because the numerator in 2/5 is double the numerator in 1/2. But the denominator changed too — the pieces got smaller. Converting to tenths: 1/2 = 5/10 and 2/5 = 4/10. Which is larger now?


    Knowledge organiser

    Key terms:
  • balanced argument
  • evidence
  • hedging
  • modal verb
  • cohesion
  • rebuttal
  • nuance
  • perspective
  • Core facts (expected standard):
  • Audience, purpose and form in writing: Consistently identifying audience, purpose and form before writing, selecting appropriate forms using other writing as models, and making conscious language and structural choices throughout the writing process.

  • Graph context

    Node type: EnglishUnit | Study ID: EU-EN-Y5-002 Concept IDs:
  • EN-Y5-C026: Audience, purpose and form in writing (primary)
  • EN-Y5-C025: Cohesive devices and paragraph linking
  • EN-Y5-C029: Modal verbs
  • EN-Y5-C030: Passive voice
  • EN-Y5-C035: Public speaking and formal debate
  • Cypher query:

    ``cypher

    MATCH (ts:EnglishUnit {unit_id: 'EU-EN-Y5-002'})

    -[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)

    -[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)

    RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description

    ``


    Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.