The Big Questions: Does God Exist?
6 lessons
Session structure: Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
A structured sequence for exploring contested issues or multiple perspectives. Begins with a stimulus that raises a question or dilemma, builds knowledge through research, develops arguments through structured discussion techniques, captures thinking in writing, and reflects on how views may have changed.
stimulus → research → structured_discussion → writing → reflection
Assessment: Balanced written argument or persuasive piece demonstrating understanding of multiple perspectives, supported by evidence, with a reasoned personal conclusion.
Teacher note: Use the DISCUSSION AND DEBATE template: present a substantive question or ethical dilemma. Expect pupils to research different perspectives and prepare evidence-based arguments. Facilitate structured discussion using protocols such as Harkness or four corners. Guide pupils to produce a written response that acknowledges multiple viewpoints and justifies their own position.
KS3 question stems:
Why this study matters
The existence of God is the foundational philosophical question in RS and the one that most engages KS3 pupils. Exploring classical arguments (cosmological, teleological, moral) alongside counter-arguments (Problem of Evil, science and religion debate) develops the analytical and evaluative skills required at GCSE. Pupils encounter genuinely different perspectives (theist, atheist, agnostic) and learn to construct reasoned arguments from evidence rather than assertion.
Pitfalls to avoid
Cross-curricular opportunities
| Link | Subject | Connection | Strength |
| Persuasive and Argumentative Writing | English | Persuasive and argumentative writing: constructing balanced arguments | Moderate |
Vocabulary word mat
| Term | Meaning |
| theism |
| atheism |
| agnosticism |
| cosmological argument |
| teleological argument |
| Problem of Evil |
| omnipotent |
| omniscient |
| omnibenevolent |
| faith |
| reason |
Scaffolding and inclusion (Y7)
| Guideline | Detail |
| Reading level | Secondary Transition Reader (Lexile 700–950) |
| Text-to-speech | Available |
| Max sentence length | 30 words |
| Vocabulary | Secondary curriculum vocabulary including discipline-specific terms. Etymology and morphology appropriate (e.g., prefixes, roots). Formal academic register expected. |
| Scaffolding level | Light |
| Hint tiers | 4 tiers |
| Session length | 25–40 minutes |
| Worked examples | Required — Text-based. Reference solutions available after independent attempt. |
| Feedback tone | Academic Peer |
| Normalize struggle | Yes |
| Example correct feedback | Correct — and the implication is worth noting: if this is true, then [connected consequence] should also hold. Does it? |
| Example error feedback | That reasoning has a gap: you assumed [X], but the evidence points the other way because [Y]. Revise your argument in light of that. |
Knowledge organiser
Key terms:Graph context
Node type:TopicSuggestion | Study ID: TS-RS-KS3-001
Cypher query:
``cypher
MATCH (ts:TopicSuggestion {suggestion_id: 'TS-RS-KS3-001'})
-[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)
-[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)
RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description
``
Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.