Concepts
This study delivers 1 primary concept and 0 secondary concepts.
Primary concept: Ratio and Proportion (MA-Y6-C012)
Type: Process | Teaching weight: 3/6Mastery of ratio and proportion means pupils can express the relationship between two quantities using ratio notation (a:b), scale up and down using a multiplier, solve problems involving sharing in a given ratio, and use percentages and fractions as tools for expressing proportional relationships. A fully secure pupil understands the difference between additive comparison (A has 3 more than B) and multiplicative comparison (A has 3 times as many as B) and can identify which type of reasoning is required by a problem.
Teaching guidance: Begin with practical activities: making paint colours from different proportions of red and yellow, mixing squash with water, dividing a class into boys and girls in a given ratio. The 'unitary method' — finding the value of one part and scaling — should be taught alongside the 'scale factor' method. Bar models are particularly effective for ratio problems as they make the proportional structure visible. Connect to percentage increase and decrease as applications of proportion. Similar shapes provide a geometric context in which scale factors arise naturally. Key vocabulary: ratio, proportion, scale factor, unitary method, parts, share, for every, in the ratio, percentage, similar Common misconceptions: Pupils frequently apply additive rather than multiplicative reasoning in proportion problems (e.g., if a recipe for 4 serves uses 200 g flour and 150 g butter, pupils subtract to get 50 g 'difference' and add 50 g for each extra serving rather than using the ratio 4:3). In sharing problems, pupils sometimes give each person the stated number of parts rather than computing the value of each part. The bar model is the most effective tool for preventing both misconceptions.Differentiation
| Level | What success looks like | Example task | Common errors |
| Entry | Sharing a quantity in a simple ratio using the 'one part' method with concrete or pictorial support. | Share 20 sweets between Ali and Ben in the ratio 3:2. How many does each person get? | Dividing 20 by 3 and 20 by 2 separately (getting 6.67 and 10); Not finding the total number of parts first |
| Developing | Solving proportion problems using the unitary method or scale factor, including simple recipes and scaling. | A recipe for 4 people uses 300g flour. How much flour for 6 people? | Adding 2 people worth of flour by adding 2 × 75 = 150 to 300 = 450 (correct result, but additive reasoning can fail in harder cases); Using additive reasoning: 6 is 2 more than 4, so add 2 × 50 = 100g more (wrong) |
| Expected | Solving ratio and proportion problems involving missing values, including percentage contexts, using multiplicative reasoning. | In a class, the ratio of boys to girls is 3:5. There are 15 girls. How many children are in the class altogether? | Adding 3 to 15 instead of finding the multiplier (saying 18 children); Not finding the value of one part before scaling |
| Greater Depth | Solving multi-step ratio problems where the ratio must be inferred from context, or where a change in one quantity requires reasoning about the effect on the ratio. | Purple paint is made by mixing red and blue in the ratio 3:5. Sam has 600 ml of purple paint. He adds 150 ml more red paint. What is the new ratio of red to blue? Give your answer in its simplest form. | Adding 150 ml to the total and re-splitting in the original ratio (not understanding only red changed); Simplifying 375:375 as 3:3 instead of 1:1 |
Model response (Entry): Total parts: 3 + 2 = 5. One part = 20 ÷ 5 = 4. Ali gets 3 × 4 = 12. Ben gets 2 × 4 = 8.
Model response (Developing): For 1 person: 300 ÷ 4 = 75g. For 6 people: 75 × 6 = 450g.
Model response (Expected): Girls represent 5 parts. 5 parts = 15, so 1 part = 3. Boys = 3 parts = 9. Total: 15 + 9 = 24.
Model response (Greater Depth): Original: 3 + 5 = 8 parts. One part = 600 ÷ 8 = 75 ml. Red = 3 × 75 = 225 ml. Blue = 5 × 75 = 375 ml. After adding red: 225 + 150 = 375 ml red. Blue stays at 375 ml. New ratio = 375:375 = 1:1.
Representation stages (CPA)
| Stage | Description | Resources | Transition cue |
| Concrete | Mixing paint, juice or recipe ingredients in given ratios, physically sharing objects into ratio groups using sorting trays, and using Cuisenaire rods to show proportional relationships | sorting trays, counters (two colours), Cuisenaire rods, measuring jugs (for mixing), recipe cards | Child finds the value of one part by dividing by the total number of parts and scales correctly without physical objects |
| Pictorial | Drawing bar models to represent ratios, recording ratio tables showing scaling, and solving proportion problems on paper | bar model template, ratio table template, squared paper | Child solves ratio and proportion problems on paper using bar models or the unitary method, selecting the most efficient approach |
| Abstract | Solving ratio and proportion problems mentally, using the unitary method and scale factors, and distinguishing multiplicative from additive relationships | Child solves any ratio/proportion problem efficiently and always identifies whether a problem requires multiplicative or additive reasoning |
Thinking lens: Scale, Proportion and Quantity (primary)
Key question: How big, how many, or how much — and how does that change how we think about it? Why this lens fits: Ratio and proportion are the formal language of multiplicative comparison — this cluster teaches pupils to express and use relative quantities directly, bridging all prior fraction and multiplicative work to KS3 Ratio, Proportion and Rates of Change. Question stems for KS2:Session structure: Worked Example Set + Practical Application
This study uses 2 vehicle templates:
Worked Example Set (main structure)
A mastery-oriented mathematics sequence moving through the concrete-pictorial-abstract progression with activation and reasoning extension phases. Begins by activating prior knowledge, introduces new concepts with physical manipulatives, transitions to pictorial representations, develops abstract fluency, applies in context, and extends through reasoning challenges.
activation → concrete → pictorial → abstract → application → reasoning_extension
Assessment: Graduated practice set moving from guided examples to independent application, with reasoning task requiring explanation of method and justification of answers.
Teacher note: Use the WORKED EXAMPLE SET template: activate prior knowledge and address common misconceptions. Guide pupils through the concrete-pictorial-abstract progression, modelling each step with clear mathematical language. Provide varied practice that builds fluency, then extend with reasoning problems that require pupils to explain, justify, or spot errors. Use bar models and diagrams to build conceptual understanding.
KS2 question stems:
Practical Application
A hands-on sequence where pupils apply knowledge and skills to solve a practical problem or create a functional outcome. Begins with a real-world context, builds skills through rehearsal, guides design or planning, supports making or problem-solving, and concludes with evaluation against success criteria.
context → skill_rehearsal → design → make_or_solve → evaluate
Assessment: Practical outcome (solution, product, program) evaluated against defined success criteria, with written or verbal explanation of the process and decisions made.
Teacher note: Use the PRACTICAL APPLICATION template: set a real-world context or problem that requires pupils to apply knowledge and skills. Rehearse the key skills needed through guided practice. Support pupils in designing their approach, carrying out the practical task, and evaluating their outcome. Encourage them to explain what worked well and what they would improve.
KS2 question stems:
Mathematical reasoning skills (KS2)
These disciplinary skills should be woven through teaching, not taught in isolation:
Vocabulary word mat
| Term | Meaning |
| for every | A phrase used to express a ratio relationship, describing proportional correspondence between quantities. |
| in the ratio | A phrase describing the proportional relationship between two or more quantities. |
| parts | The pieces that make up a whole; in fractions, the equal sections of a divided whole. |
| percentage | A way of expressing a number as a fraction of 100, used to compare proportions. |
| proportion | The relative size of a part compared to the whole, often expressed as a fraction, decimal, or percentage. |
| ratio | A way of comparing two or more quantities, showing how much of one thing there is for every amount of another, written with a colon. |
| scale factor | The number by which all dimensions of a shape are multiplied to enlarge or reduce it. |
| share | To divide a quantity equally among a group. |
| similar | Having the same shape but not necessarily the same size; corresponding angles are equal and sides are proportional. |
| unitary method | A strategy for solving proportion problems by first finding the value of one unit, then scaling up. |
Prior knowledge (retrieval plan)
Pupils should already know the following from earlier units:
| Prior knowledge needed | For concept | Description |
| Measuring angles in degrees using a protractor | Ratio and Proportion | Angles are measured in degrees (°). A full turn is 360°; a right angle is 90°; a straight line is... |
Assessment alignment (KS2)
KS2 test framework content domain codes assessed by this study:
| Code | Description | Assesses concept |
| CDC-KS2-MA-6R1 | Year 6: relative sizes, similarity | Ratio and Proportion |
| CDC-KS2-MA-6R2 | Year 6: use of percentages for comparison | Ratio and Proportion |
| CDC-KS2-MA-6R3 | Year 6: scale factors | Ratio and Proportion |
| CDC-KS2-MA-6R4 | Year 6: unequal sharing and grouping | Ratio and Proportion |
Scaffolding and inclusion (Y6)
| Guideline | Detail |
| Reading level | Proficient Reader (Lexile 600–800) |
| Text-to-speech | Available |
| Max sentence length | 25 words |
| Vocabulary | Academic vocabulary expected without scaffolding. Literary vocabulary (connotation, imagery, personification) established. Etymology useful for unfamiliar vocabulary. |
| Scaffolding level | Light |
| Hint tiers | 4 tiers |
| Session length | 25–40 minutes |
| Worked examples | Required — Student-completed faded examples. Text-based. Example solutions shown for comparison after independent attempt. |
| Feedback tone | Intellectual Peer |
| Normalize struggle | Yes |
| Example correct feedback | Your rhythmic analysis correctly identified the iambic pattern in lines 2 and 4, and you rightly noted the disruption in line 3. The question is: why might Shakespeare have broken the metre there? |
| Example error feedback | There is a problem with that interpretation: you suggested the character is happy at the end, but the meter becomes irregular in the final couplet — what might that irregularity signal about their emotional state? |
Knowledge organiser
Core facts (expected standard):Graph context
Node type:MathsTopicSuggestion | Study ID: MTS-Y6-004
Concept IDs:
MA-Y6-C012: Ratio and Proportion (primary)``cypher
MATCH (ts:MathsTopicSuggestion {suggestion_id: 'MTS-Y6-004'})
-[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)
-[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)
RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description
``
Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.