Science KS1 Y1Y2 Mandatory

Which Material Is Best?

2 lessons

Subject
Science
Key Stage
KS1
Year group
Y1, Y2
Statutory reference
Y1 Everyday materials: distinguish between an object and the material from which it is made; identify and name a variety of everyday materials, including wood, plastic, glass, metal, water and rock
Source document
Science (KS1/KS2) - National Curriculum Programme of Study
Estimated duration
2 lessons
Status
Mandatory
Coverage: 10/13 expected capabilities surfaced
Curriculum anchorConcept modelDifferentiation dataThinking lensLesson structureSubject referencesCross-curricular linksPrior knowledge linksLearner scaffoldingAccess and inclusion
Vocabulary definitionsSuccess criteriaAssessment alignment

Enquiry questions

  • Which material is best for keeping teddy dry?

  • Concepts

    This study delivers 1 primary concept and 4 secondary concepts.

    Primary concept: Object vs Material Distinction (SC-KS1-C024)

    Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 1/6

    The conceptual distinction between an object (a made thing with a function, such as a chair, a bottle, or a window) and the material it is made from (the substance of which it consists, such as wood, glass, or plastic). This is a foundational concept in chemistry that underpins all further study of materials. An object can be made from multiple materials; the same material can be used to make many different objects.

    Teaching guidance: Use a 'what is it made of?' routine when handling objects. Deliberately choose objects made from one obvious material first, then introduce objects made from multiple materials. Classroom hunts where pupils label each object and its material(s) are effective. Emphasise the question 'What is it made from?' as distinct from 'What is it?' Key vocabulary: object, material, made from, made of, wood, plastic, glass, metal, contains Common misconceptions: Children frequently name an object when asked what it is made of (e.g., saying 'table' when the material is 'wood'). Some children believe that only man-made things are materials, not natural materials like rock or water.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeExample taskCommon errors

    EntryBeginning to distinguish between what an object is and what it is made from, when prompted by the teacher.I am holding a wooden spoon. What is the object? What is it made from?Answering 'spoon' for both questions — naming the object when asked for the material; Not understanding the question 'What is it made from?'
    DevelopingConsistently distinguishing object from material for several everyday items, beginning to notice that the same object can be made from different materials.Name the object and the material for each: a glass bottle, a plastic ruler, a metal coin.Saying 'glass' is the object rather than the material; Not recognising that 'plastic' is a material, not a type of object
    ExpectedExplaining the difference between an object and a material, and recognising that a single object can be made from more than one material.Look at this pair of scissors. Is 'scissors' a material or an object? What materials is it made from? Why might it use more than one material?Not noticing that the scissors has more than one material; Not being able to explain why different materials are used for different parts
    Greater DepthExplaining that the same material can be used to make many different objects, and the same object can be made from different materials, giving examples and reasons.Give two examples of objects that can be made from glass. Then give two different materials a bottle could be made from. Why might you choose one material over another for a bottle?Thinking each material can only be used for one purpose; Not giving a reason for choosing one material over another

    Model response (Entry): The object is a spoon. It is made from wood.
    Model response (Developing): Glass bottle: the object is a bottle, the material is glass. Plastic ruler: the object is a ruler, the material is plastic. Metal coin: the object is a coin, the material is metal.
    Model response (Expected): Scissors is an object — something made for a purpose (cutting). It is made from two materials: metal for the blades because metal is hard and sharp, and plastic for the handles because plastic is comfortable to hold and does not hurt your hand. Different parts use different materials because each material has properties suited to that job.
    Model response (Greater Depth): Glass can be used to make windows and drinking glasses — because it is transparent and smooth. A bottle could be made from glass or plastic. A glass bottle is heavier but does not change the taste; a plastic bottle is lighter and does not break if you drop it, which is safer for children. The choice depends on what matters most — weight, safety, or keeping the taste.

    Secondary concept: Close Observation (SC-KS1-C002)

    Type: Skill | Teaching weight: 2/6

    The skill of carefully attending to and noticing details about objects, organisms and phenomena. Close observation at KS1 involves using multiple senses (while maintaining safety) and simple equipment such as hand lenses to reveal details not visible to the naked eye. Mastery is shown when pupils can describe what they observe with increasing precision and use observations as evidence.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

    EntryLooking at an object or organism and describing one or two things they notice using everyday language, with teacher prompting.Describing what they expect to see rather than what they actually observe; Giving a single-word answer ('green') without describing what they notice
    DevelopingUsing more than one sense to observe carefully and describing several features, beginning to use simple scientific vocabulary.Relying only on sight and not using other senses; Describing the object's name or use rather than its observable features
    ExpectedMaking detailed observations using appropriate senses and simple equipment (hand lens), recording what they see through drawings or words with increasing precision.Drawing from memory rather than from careful observation (e.g. adding features not visible); Holding the hand lens too far from the object to get a clear view
    Greater DepthComparing observations of two or more specimens, noting similarities and differences in detail, and using observations as evidence to answer a question.Noting only differences and not similarities, or vice versa; Making identification guesses without linking them to observed features

    Secondary concept: Simple Testing (SC-KS1-C003)

    Type: Process | Teaching weight: 2/6

    Carrying out simple practical investigations to answer scientific questions. At KS1 this includes comparative tests (which of these is best for...?) and observation-based investigations. Pupils begin to understand the idea of keeping things the same (a rudimentary understanding of fair testing) and changing just one thing at a time. Mastery is evident when pupils can carry out a simple test independently and describe what they did and found out.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

    EntryFollowing a teacher-led investigation step by step, observing what happens and describing the result with support.Describing what they wanted to happen rather than what actually happened; Not watching carefully enough to notice the difference
    DevelopingCarrying out a simple test with a partner, following given instructions, and recording the result in a simple format.Using different numbers of drops on each material without realising it makes the test unfair; Recording only 'yes' or 'no' without describing what they observed
    ExpectedSetting up a simple comparative test with some independence, keeping one thing the same while changing another, and describing what the results show.Changing more than one thing at a time (different amounts of water and different sized pieces); Choosing the material they like best rather than the one the evidence supports
    Greater DepthPlanning and carrying out a simple test independently, explaining why they kept things the same to make it fair, and suggesting what they would do differently next time.Not explaining why keeping things the same matters for fairness; Not thinking about how to improve the test when reflecting

    Secondary concept: Material Identification (SC-KS1-C025)

    Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 1/6

    The ability to recognise and name common everyday materials: wood, plastic, glass, metal, water, rock, brick, paper, cardboard, fabric, elastic and foil. Building a broad vocabulary of material names allows pupils to describe the world with precision and is prerequisite to studying material properties and suitability.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

    EntryNaming two or three common everyday materials (wood, plastic, metal) when shown examples.Naming the object instead of the material; Calling all hard materials 'metal'
    DevelopingNaming a wider range of everyday materials including wood, plastic, glass, metal, water, rock, fabric and paper.Confusing glass with clear plastic; Not recognising fabric as a material (calling it 'cloth' or 'curtain')
    ExpectedIdentifying all NC-specified materials (wood, plastic, glass, metal, water, rock, brick, paper, cardboard, fabric, elastic, foil) and distinguishing between similar-looking materials by testing properties.Thinking transparent objects are always glass; Not thinking of ways to test beyond looking
    Greater DepthClassifying materials as natural or manufactured and explaining that some manufactured materials are designed to have specific properties.Thinking all materials humans use are manufactured; Not recognising that glass is manufactured from natural materials (sand)

    Secondary concept: Material Properties (SC-KS1-C026)

    Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 2/6

    Knowledge and understanding of the physical properties of common materials expressed through paired descriptors: hard/soft, stretchy/stiff, shiny/dull, rough/smooth, bendy/not bendy, waterproof/not waterproof, absorbent/not absorbent, opaque/transparent. Pupils test and describe properties of materials through direct sensory investigation and simple tests. Mastery involves accurately describing a material's properties using scientific vocabulary.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

    EntryDescribing one property of a given material using simple paired descriptors (hard/soft, rough/smooth), with teacher modelling.Using general terms like 'nice' or 'not nice' instead of property words; Confusing rough with hard
    DevelopingUsing several paired descriptors to describe the properties of materials: hard/soft, rough/smooth, shiny/dull, bendy/stiff.Describing what the material looks like (silver) rather than its properties; Using only one descriptor and struggling to think of more
    ExpectedTesting and describing a range of material properties including waterproof/not waterproof, absorbent/not absorbent, opaque/transparent, and recording results systematically.Confusing transparent with translucent (frosted glass lets some light through but is not transparent); Not testing properly — guessing rather than dripping water to check waterproofness
    Greater DepthRecognising that the same material can have different properties depending on how it has been treated, and that properties can be tested and measured rather than just described.Thinking each material has fixed properties that can never be changed; Not realising that manufactured changes to materials are deliberate design choices


    Thinking lens: Patterns (primary)

    Key question: What patterns can I notice here, and what do they allow me to predict? Why this lens fits: Data from repeated investigations reveals patterns that allow pupils to generalise their findings beyond the specific test conditions. Question stems for KS1:
  • What is the same about these?
  • What is different?
  • What comes next?
  • Can you sort these into groups?
  • Secondary lens: Cause and Effect — Fair testing and investigations are designed to isolate variables and establish causal relationships — the cognitive demand is reasoning from controlled evidence to causal claims.

    Session structure: Fair Test

    Fair Test

    The classic scientific enquiry: formulating a testable question, making a prediction based on scientific understanding, designing a method that controls variables, collecting and recording data systematically, analysing results, and drawing a conclusion linked back to the original hypothesis.

    questionhypothesismethoddata_collectionanalysisconclusion Assessment: Structured scientific report including question, hypothesis with reasoning, method with variables identified, results table/graph, and conclusion evaluating whether results support the hypothesis. Teacher note: Use the FAIR TEST template: start with a simple question that children can investigate by changing one thing and seeing what happens. Help them predict what they think will happen using 'I think... because...' sentences. Guide them to observe carefully using their senses, and talk about what they found out. Keep tests hands-on with everyday materials. KS1 question stems:
  • What do you think will happen? Why?
  • What did you change? What did you keep the same?
  • What did you find out?
  • Was your guess right? What surprised you?

  • Variables

    Independent: type of material Dependent: amount of water passing through Controlled: amount of water, size of material

    Equipment and safety

    Equipment:
  • material samples (fabric, plastic bag, foil, paper, card, cling film)
  • small teddy bear or toy
  • water spray bottle or watering can
  • measuring spoon
  • paper towels
  • Safety notes: Mop up water spills promptly to prevent slipping. Ensure glass samples are not used for the waterproof test. Supervise water pouring to avoid flooding the table. (Hazard level: low)

    Expected outcome

    Children discover that different materials have different properties (waterproof, absorbent, flexible, strong) that make them suitable for different purposes. Plastic and foil keep teddy dry because they are waterproof; paper and fabric let water through because they are absorbent.

    Recording format: simple tables, verbal descriptions

    Enquiry type

    Fair Test

    A controlled investigation where one variable is deliberately changed while all others are kept the same, to determine whether the changed variable has an effect on a measured outcome. The gold-standard enquiry type for causal questions in science.

    Question stems:
  • How does [independent variable] affect [dependent variable]?
  • Does changing [variable] make a difference to [outcome]?
  • What is the relationship between [variable A] and [variable B]?
  • Teacher scaffold:
  • What will you change? (independent variable)
  • What will you measure or observe? (dependent variable)
  • What will you keep the same? (controlled variables)
  • What do you predict will happen? Why?
  • Was your prediction correct? What does the evidence show?

  • Why this study matters

    This is the most widely taught KS1 fair test because the context is immediately meaningful (keeping teddy dry), the variables are tangible, and the results are visible and dramatic. Children can see and feel the difference between waterproof and absorbent materials, making the abstract concept of material properties concrete. The investigation builds early fair testing skills: changing one thing, observing the result, and comparing materials systematically.


    Pitfalls to avoid

  • Children pour different amounts of water on each material, making comparison unfair — agree a standard amount before starting
  • Pupils focus only on waterproofness and miss other material properties (strength, flexibility) — discuss why plastic bags are waterproof but not strong enough for some purposes
  • Recording is verbal only and not captured — provide a simple table with material names pre-printed so children tick or draw results

  • Cross-curricular opportunities

    LinkSubjectConnectionStrength

    Moving Pictures (Sliders and Levers)Design and TechnologyChoosing suitable materials for a making task based on their propertiesStrong


    Working scientifically skills (KS1)

    These disciplinary skills should be woven through teaching, not taught in isolation:

  • Asking questions — Posing simple questions about observations and recognising that different types of question require different approaches to find an answer, including tests, observations over time, and looking in books.
  • Identifying and classifying — Sorting and grouping objects, organisms or materials according to their observable characteristics, recognising that things can be classified in more than one way depending on which features are selected.
  • Evaluating evidence and understanding scientific knowledge development — Critically evaluating data for random and systematic error, and understanding how scientific methods and theories evolve as new evidence emerges — including the roles of publication, peer review and replication in establishing trustworthy scientific knowledge.
  • Recording data in varied formats — Presenting collected data and results in an appropriate range of formats — including scientific diagrams, labelled drawings, classification keys, tables, bar charts, line graphs and scatter graphs — selecting the format suited to the type of data.
  • Making systematic observations and measurements — Conducting careful, methodical observations and taking accurate measurements using standard units and a range of scientific equipment, including thermometers and data loggers, with Upper KS2 pupils also taking repeat readings to improve reliability.
  • Interpreting data and identifying patterns — Analysing observations and quantitative data to identify trends, correlations and patterns, and using these findings to draw evidence-based conclusions that go beyond a simple restatement of the results.

  • Vocabulary word mat

    TermMeaning

    absorbent
    bendy
    brick
    cardboard
    change
    compare
    contains
    describe
    detail
    different
    dull
    elastic
    fabric
    fair
    find out
    flexible
    foil
    glass
    hard
    look closely
    made from
    made of
    magnify
    man-made
    material
    metal
    natural
    notice
    object
    observe
    opaque
    paper
    plastic
    property
    result
    rigid
    rock
    rough
    same
    shiny
    smooth
    soft
    stiff
    stretchy
    test
    transparent
    water
    waterproof
    wood
    strong
    suitable

    Prior knowledge (retrieval plan)

    Pupils should already know the following from earlier units:

    Prior knowledge neededFor conceptDescription

    Asking Scientific QuestionsSimple TestingThe ability to formulate questions about the natural world that can be investigated through scien...
    Observation of Living ThingsClose ObservationThe ability to closely observe animals and plants in the natural world and to record these observ...


    Scaffolding and inclusion (Y1)

    GuidelineDetail

    Reading levelPre-reader / Emergent
    Text-to-speechRequired
    Max sentence length8 words
    VocabularyConcrete nouns and action verbs only. No abstract concepts without physical anchor. Examples: dog, apple, jump, big, one more.
    Scaffolding levelMaximum
    Hint tiers2 tiers
    Session length5–12 minutes
    Worked examplesRequired — Animated, narrated walkthrough with no text. Character models the thinking aloud.
    Feedback toneWarm Nurturing
    Normalize struggleYes
    Example correct feedbackThe frog jumped exactly four spaces — you counted perfectly!
    Example error feedbackOh, let us count again together! [animation demonstrates]


    Access and Inclusion

    Likely barriers

    This study has high demands on: Multi-Step Instruction Demand (Simple testing requires following a sequence: formulate a question, set up equipment, keep conditions fair, make observations, record findings. Even 'simple' investigations have 4-5 sequential steps that must be completed in order.), Vocabulary Novelty (Material properties introduces many paired descriptors simultaneously: hard/soft, stretchy/stiff, shiny/dull, rough/smooth, bendy/not bendy, waterproof/not waterproof, absorbent/not absorbent, opaque/transparent. That is 16 vocabulary items in one topic.).

    Moderate demands on: Fine Motor Output Demand (Practical investigations require manipulating equipment: pouring water, positioning objects, using hand lenses, handling specimens. Children with fine motor difficulties may struggle with the physical execution of investigations.), Sensory Stimulation Load (Testing material properties involves handling multiple textures, surfaces and substances. Children with tactile defensiveness or sensory processing difficulties may find the multi-texture exploration distressing.), Sustained Attention Demand (Close observation requires maintaining focused visual attention on a specimen or phenomenon for an extended period, noticing details rather than making quick judgements. Children with ADHD may observe briefly but miss the details that emerge from sustained looking.), Abstractness Without Concrete Anchor (The distinction between an object and a material is a fundamental conceptual abstraction — separating 'what something is' from 'what something is made of'. Young children naturally think in terms of objects; materials thinking is a taught scientific perspective.).

    Universal supports

    Apply by default for all learners:

  • Visual Supports — Providing visual representations alongside or instead of verbal/written information: icons, diagrams, picture cues, symbol-supported text, visual timetables, and graphic organisers. Visual supports make abstract information concrete and persistent (the child can refer back to them), reducing reliance on auditory processing and transient memory.
  • Chunked Instructions — Breaking multi-step instructions into individual steps, presented one at a time with visual numbering. The child completes each step before the next is revealed. This reduces working memory load and prevents the common pattern where a child hears a 4-step instruction, begins step 1, and by the time they finish has forgotten steps 2-4.
  • Calm / Low-Stimulation Mode — A presentation mode that removes or minimises sensory stimulation: no animations, no sound effects, no gamification elements, no time pressure visuals, muted colour palette, and minimal transitions. Essential for children with sensory processing difficulties, autism, or anxiety, for whom standard 'engaging' design features are actively distressing.
  • Reduced Visual Clutter — Simplifying the visual layout of materials: fewer items per screen, larger font, more white space, reduced decorative elements, high-contrast colour scheme, and clear visual hierarchy. This is not 'dumbing down' — it is removing visual noise that interferes with cognitive processing.
  • Vocabulary Pre-Teaching — Explicitly teaching key vocabulary before the main lesson begins, so that unfamiliar terms do not block access to the concept. Pre-teaching uses the define-show-use-check pattern: define the word simply, show it in context with visual support, use it in a sentence, then check the child can use it themselves. Typically targets 2-4 key words per session.
  • Extended Processing Time — Allowing the child more time to process information and formulate responses without any time pressure or implied urgency. This is not 'extra time' in the exam access arrangement sense — it is the removal of time constraints that have no pedagogical justification. Processing speed varies naturally across children; slower processing does not indicate lower understanding.
  • Targeted options

  • Alternative Response Mode — Allowing the child to demonstrate their understanding through a different output modality than the one assumed by the task. For example: verbal instead of written, drag-and-drop instead of handwriting, drawing instead of writing, voice recording instead of typing. The key principle is that the response mode should not prevent the child from showing what they know. (targets: Fine Motor Output Demand)
  • Worked Example First — Showing a fully worked example of the type of task the child will be asked to complete before they attempt their own. The worked example is annotated to show the thinking process, not just the answer. This reduces the cognitive load of figuring out both WHAT to do and HOW to do it simultaneously. Particularly effective for procedural tasks in maths and structured writing in English. (targets: Multi-Step Instruction Demand, Abstractness Without Concrete Anchor)
  • Task Breakdown with Visual Checklist — Providing a visual checklist that decomposes a complex task into discrete, checkable sub-tasks. The child ticks off each element as they complete it, providing a sense of progress and reducing the overwhelm of a large task. This goes beyond chunked instructions (SS-01) by showing the whole task overview with completion tracking. (targets: Multi-Step Instruction Demand, Sustained Attention Demand)
  • Predictable Session Structure — Using a consistent, predictable sequence of activities within every learning session so the child knows what to expect. A predictable structure reduces anxiety about the unknown, supports children who struggle with transitions, and allows the child to allocate their cognitive resources to learning rather than to managing uncertainty. The structure should be visual, persistent, and identical in format across sessions. (targets: Sensory Stimulation Load, Sustained Attention Demand)
  • Micro-Breaks — Scheduled brief pauses within a session, built into the task flow rather than requiring the child to self-regulate. Micro-breaks of 30-90 seconds occur at natural break points (between task sections, after a challenging question). They may include a simple breathing prompt, a brief stretch, or simply a pause screen. These are preventative — they reduce fatigue before it becomes shutdown. (targets: Sensory Stimulation Load, Sustained Attention Demand)
  • Simplified Language Wrapper — Rewriting task instructions, questions, and explanations using simpler sentence structures, shorter sentences, and more common vocabulary — while preserving the full complexity of the underlying concept. The mathematical, scientific, or literary idea is not simplified; only the language surrounding it is made more accessible. This requires careful judgement about which words are domain-essential (keep) versus incidental complexity (simplify). (targets: Vocabulary Novelty)
  • Word Bank — Providing a curated set of words the child may need during a writing or response task, displayed persistently on screen. This offloads spelling from working memory, allowing the child to focus on content, sentence structure, and ideas. The word bank contains domain-specific vocabulary, connectives, and high-frequency words the child is known to struggle with. (targets: Vocabulary Novelty)
  • Adaptive Difficulty Stepping — Using the DifficultyLevel data to present tasks at a level matched to the child's current attainment, stepping up only when the child demonstrates readiness. For a child working at 'entry' level while peers are at 'expected', this means presenting entry-level tasks with the option to progress — never assuming the child should start where their year group expects. The DifficultyLevel descriptions, example_tasks, and common_errors drive the adaptive presentation. (targets: Abstractness Without Concrete Anchor)
  • Concrete Manipulatives (Extended) — Maintaining access to physical or on-screen manipulatives beyond the point where the curriculum typically moves to pictorial or abstract representation. Some children with dyscalculia or learning difficulties need to remain at the concrete stage significantly longer than their peers. This is a pedagogically valid position — concrete understanding IS mathematical understanding, not a lesser version of it. (targets: Abstractness Without Concrete Anchor)
  • Use with caution

  • Alternative Response Mode — construct risk: conditional. Unsafe when assessing: fine_motor_output_demand, handwriting_copying_load
  • Simplified Language Wrapper — construct risk: conditional. Unsafe when assessing: language_load
  • Word Bank — construct risk: conditional. Unsafe when assessing: vocabulary_novelty
  • Extended Processing Time — construct risk: conditional. Unsafe when assessing: time_pressure
  • Concrete Manipulatives (Extended) — construct risk: conditional. Unsafe when assessing: abstractness_without_concrete_anchor

  • Knowledge organiser

    Key terms:
  • material
  • waterproof
  • absorbent
  • strong
  • flexible
  • suitable
  • test
  • compare
  • Core facts (expected standard):
  • Object vs Material Distinction: Explaining the difference between an object and a material, and recognising that a single object can be made from more than one material.

  • Graph context

    Node type: ScienceEnquiry | Study ID: SE-KS1-006 Concept IDs:
  • SC-KS1-C024: Object vs Material Distinction (primary)
  • SC-KS1-C002: Close Observation
  • SC-KS1-C003: Simple Testing
  • SC-KS1-C025: Material Identification
  • SC-KS1-C026: Material Properties
  • Cypher query:

    ``cypher

    MATCH (ts:ScienceEnquiry {enquiry_id: 'SE-KS1-006'})

    -[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)

    -[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)

    RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description

    ``


    Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.