Science KS2 Y5 Mandatory

Friction Investigation

3 lessons

Subject
Science
Key Stage
KS2
Year group
Y5
Statutory reference
Y5 Forces: identify the effects of air resistance, water resistance and friction, that act between moving surfaces
Source document
Science (KS1/KS2) - National Curriculum Programme of Study
Estimated duration
3 lessons
Status
Mandatory
Coverage: 9/13 expected capabilities surfaced
Curriculum anchorConcept modelDifferentiation dataThinking lensLesson structureSubject referencesCross-curricular linksPrior knowledge linksLearner scaffolding
Vocabulary definitionsSuccess criteriaAssessment alignmentAccess and inclusion

Enquiry questions

  • How does the surface affect how far a toy car travels?

  • Concepts

    This study delivers 1 primary concept and 1 secondary concept.

    Primary concept: Contact and Non-Contact Forces (SC-KS2-C025)

    Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 3/6

    Understanding that most forces require direct contact between objects (e.g., pushing, pulling, friction) but some forces, notably magnetic forces and gravity, can act at a distance without direct contact.

    Teaching guidance: Explore contact forces through practical activities: pushing and pulling objects, observing friction between surfaces, and feeling the resistance of water when moving objects through it. Introduce non-contact forces using magnets (attraction and repulsion without touching) and dropping objects (gravity pulls without touching). Create a two-column sorting activity: 'forces that need touching' versus 'forces that act at a distance'. Use force arrows to represent the direction of forces on simple diagrams. Discuss everyday examples of both types. Key vocabulary: force, push, pull, contact, non-contact, friction, gravity, magnetic, attract, repel, distance, surface, direction, strength, interaction Common misconceptions: Children commonly think a force is needed to keep an object moving, rather than understanding that forces are needed to start, stop or change movement (a precursor to Newton's first law). Some pupils believe gravity only acts on heavy objects or only works at large distances. Children may think that magnetic force requires contact because they usually see magnets touching metal objects — they need to explore magnetic attraction through materials and at a distance.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeExample taskCommon errors

    EntryKnowing that pushes and pulls are forces, and that forces can make things move, stop or change direction.Give an example of a push force and a pull force.Not recognising that gravity is a force because nothing visible is pushing or pulling; Thinking forces only exist when something is moving
    DevelopingDistinguishing between contact forces (push, pull, friction — require touching) and non-contact forces (gravity, magnetism — act at a distance).Sort these forces into contact and non-contact: friction, gravity, pushing a trolley, a magnet attracting a paper clip.Thinking gravity is a contact force; Not realising that magnets can act without touching
    ExpectedExplaining the difference between contact and non-contact forces with multiple examples, and understanding that forces can be measured using a force meter (Newtons).Explain what a non-contact force is. Give two examples and describe how each one works.Thinking non-contact forces are weaker than contact forces; Not mentioning that non-contact forces can work through gaps
    Greater DepthApplying understanding of forces to explain phenomena where multiple forces act simultaneously, and recognising balanced and unbalanced forces.A book sits on a table without moving. Are there forces acting on it? Explain.Thinking no forces act on stationary objects; Not understanding that balanced forces result in no movement

    Model response (Entry): Pushing a door open is a push force. Pulling a drawer out is a pull force.
    Model response (Developing): Contact forces (need touching): friction (surfaces rubbing), pushing a trolley (hand touches trolley). Non-contact forces (act at a distance): gravity (pulls objects down without touching), magnet (attracts paper clip without touching it).
    Model response (Expected): A non-contact force acts between objects without them touching. Gravity pulls all objects toward the Earth — when you drop a ball, gravity pulls it down even though nothing visible is pushing it. Magnetic force can attract or repel — a magnet attracts an iron paper clip across a gap, pulling it through the air without touching. Both forces get weaker with distance. Contact forces like friction and air resistance require surfaces or objects to be in direct contact.
    Model response (Greater Depth): Yes, two forces are acting on the book even though it is not moving. Gravity pulls the book downward toward the Earth. The table pushes the book upward with an equal force (called the normal reaction force). These forces are balanced — they are equal in size but opposite in direction, so the book stays still. If the forces were unbalanced (for example, if you pushed down on the book), the book would move. Objects can have forces acting on them and still be stationary — this happens when the forces are balanced. This is an important idea that leads to Newton's First Law.

    Secondary concept: Friction and Movement on Surfaces (SC-KS2-C027)

    Type: Knowledge | Teaching weight: 3/6

    Understanding that the surface of an object affects how it moves — rough surfaces produce more friction and slow objects down more than smooth surfaces. Friction is a contact force.

    Differentiation

    LevelWhat success looks likeCommon errors

    EntryKnowing that some surfaces are easier to slide on than others, from everyday experience.Not connecting the difficulty of sliding to the surface's roughness; Thinking the object changes rather than the surface
    DevelopingUsing the word 'friction' to describe the force between surfaces that slows movement, and knowing that rough surfaces create more friction.Describing friction without naming it as a force; Thinking smooth surfaces have no friction at all
    ExpectedInvestigating how friction varies on different surfaces, measuring results systematically, and explaining that friction is a contact force that can be both useful and a nuisance.Thinking friction is always a problem to be reduced; Not measuring the force consistently across all surfaces
    Greater DepthDesigning friction investigations with controlled variables and applying understanding to explain real-world engineering solutions.Thinking more tread always means more grip; Not explaining why water reduces friction (the tyre loses contact with the road)


    Thinking lens: Patterns (primary)

    Key question: What patterns can I notice here, and what do they allow me to predict? Why this lens fits: Data from repeated investigations reveals patterns that allow pupils to generalise their findings beyond the specific test conditions. Question stems for KS2:
  • What pattern can you see?
  • Does this always happen, or can you find an exception?
  • What rule connects these examples?
  • What would you predict for the next one? Why?
  • Secondary lens: Cause and Effect — Fair testing and investigations are designed to isolate variables and establish causal relationships — the cognitive demand is reasoning from controlled evidence to causal claims.

    Session structure: Fair Test

    Fair Test

    The classic scientific enquiry: formulating a testable question, making a prediction based on scientific understanding, designing a method that controls variables, collecting and recording data systematically, analysing results, and drawing a conclusion linked back to the original hypothesis.

    questionhypothesismethoddata_collectionanalysisconclusion Assessment: Structured scientific report including question, hypothesis with reasoning, method with variables identified, results table/graph, and conclusion evaluating whether results support the hypothesis. Teacher note: Use the FAIR TEST template: frame a testable question and guide pupils to identify the variable they will change, measure, and keep the same. Support them in making a prediction with a scientific reason. Collect measurements using appropriate equipment and record results in a table. Guide pupils to describe patterns in their results and say whether their prediction was supported. KS2 question stems:
  • What is our testable question?
  • What will you change, measure, and keep the same?
  • What pattern can you see in your results?
  • Does the evidence support your prediction? How do you know?

  • Variables

    Independent: surface type (carpet, wood, sandpaper, tile, fabric) Dependent: distance travelled by toy car (cm) Controlled: ramp angle, car mass, release point, same car

    Equipment and safety

    Equipment:
  • ramp
  • toy car
  • metre stick
  • surface samples (carpet, wood, sandpaper, tile, fabric)
  • masking tape
  • Safety notes: Low risk. Ensure ramp is stable and surfaces are secured flat. Keep floor area clear to prevent tripping over ramp equipment. (Hazard level: low)

    Expected outcome

    Rougher surfaces produce more friction, so the car travels a shorter distance. Smooth surfaces produce less friction. Friction is a contact force that opposes motion between surfaces.

    Recording format: results table, bar chart, written conclusion

    Enquiry type

    Fair Test

    A controlled investigation where one variable is deliberately changed while all others are kept the same, to determine whether the changed variable has an effect on a measured outcome. The gold-standard enquiry type for causal questions in science.

    KS2 guidance: At KS2, fair tests should involve tangible, observable variables. Pupils identify what they will change, measure, and keep the same. Predictions use 'I think... because...' stems. Data is recorded in tables and presented as bar charts or line graphs. Conclusions state whether the prediction was supported and give a simple causal explanation. Question stems:
  • How does [independent variable] affect [dependent variable]?
  • Does changing [variable] make a difference to [outcome]?
  • What is the relationship between [variable A] and [variable B]?
  • Teacher scaffold:
  • What will you change? (independent variable)
  • What will you measure or observe? (dependent variable)
  • What will you keep the same? (controlled variables)
  • What do you predict will happen? Why?
  • Was your prediction correct? What does the evidence show?

  • Known misconceptions

    Friction is always unhelpful

    What pupils may say: Friction is always a bad thing that slows us down. Correct explanation: Friction is essential for many everyday actions. Without friction, you could not walk (your feet would slip), hold a pen, grip a steering wheel, or brake a car. Friction is only unhelpful when it wastes energy or causes wear in machines. Whether friction is helpful or unhelpful depends on the context. Diagnostic questions:
  • Can you name three situations where friction is helpful?
  • What would happen if there was no friction between your shoes and the floor?
  • Is friction always something we want to reduce?
  • Smooth surfaces have no friction

    What pupils may say: Smooth surfaces have no friction. Correct explanation: All surfaces have some friction when they are in contact. Smoother surfaces have less friction than rougher surfaces, but friction is never zero. Even ice has friction. If there were truly no friction, you could not walk, hold objects, or stop a moving car. Friction is reduced on smooth surfaces but always present. Diagnostic questions:
  • If there were truly no friction on an ice rink, would you be able to stand up?
  • Does a smooth surface have zero friction or just less friction than a rough one?
  • What would the world be like with absolutely no friction?

  • Why this study matters

    This is the most accessible fair test in the KS2 curriculum because pupils can see and feel friction, the variables are tangible, and the measurement (distance) is straightforward. The investigation builds all the core fair testing skills: identifying variables, measuring accurately, recording in a table, presenting as a bar chart, and writing a causal conclusion.


    Pitfalls to avoid

  • Inconsistent release of the car on the ramp leads to unreliable data — model a consistent release technique before starting
  • Pupils confuse friction with gravity or air resistance — clarify friction requires contact between two surfaces
  • Pupils may think smooth surfaces have 'no friction' rather than 'less friction'

  • Cross-curricular opportunities

    LinkSubjectConnectionStrength

    Cam Mechanisms: Moving ToysDesign and TechnologyExploring friction in mechanisms and moving partsModerate
    Report Writing: Non-Chronological ReportsEnglishWriting a scientific conclusion using causal connectives (because, therefore, as a result)Moderate


    Working scientifically skills (KS2)

    These disciplinary skills should be woven through teaching, not taught in isolation:

  • Identifying and classifying — Sorting and grouping objects, organisms or materials according to their observable characteristics, recognising that things can be classified in more than one way depending on which features are selected.
  • Making and recording observations with evaluation of method — Conducting observations and measurements using a range of apparatus and methods appropriate to the investigation, and critically evaluating the reliability of those methods with reasoned suggestions for improvement.
  • Communicating findings — Presenting the outcomes of scientific enquiry in oral and written forms — including explanations, displays and presentations — using appropriate scientific language and representations to convey methods, results and conclusions clearly to others.
  • Asking relevant questions and selecting enquiry types — Formulating focused scientific questions and selecting the most appropriate enquiry method to answer them, choosing between observing over time, pattern seeking, classifying, comparative tests, fair tests, or secondary research as the situation demands.
  • Evaluating evidence and understanding scientific knowledge development — Critically evaluating data for random and systematic error, and understanding how scientific methods and theories evolve as new evidence emerges — including the roles of publication, peer review and replication in establishing trustworthy scientific knowledge.
  • Drawing conclusions and evaluating evidence — Using collected data to draw conclusions, identify causal relationships, make and test predictions, and assess the degree of trust that can be placed in results, recognising when evidence supports or refutes a scientific idea.

  • Vocabulary word mat

    TermMeaning

    attract
    contact
    direction
    distance
    force
    force meter
    friction
    gravity
    grip
    interaction
    magnetic
    non-contact
    nuisance
    pull
    push
    ramp
    repel
    resistance
    rough
    slide
    slow down
    smooth
    speed up
    strength
    surface
    useful
    contact force
    fair test
    variable
    conclusion

    Prior knowledge (retrieval plan)

    Pupils should already know the following from earlier units:

    Prior knowledge neededFor conceptDescription

    Material PropertiesFriction and Movement on SurfacesKnowledge and understanding of the physical properties of common materials expressed through pair...


    Scaffolding and inclusion (Y5)

    GuidelineDetail

    Reading levelFluent Reader (Lexile 450–650)
    Text-to-speechAvailable
    Max sentence length22 words
    VocabularyAcademic vocabulary expected. Technical domain vocabulary accessible with in-context clues. Figurative language (metaphor, personification) appropriate.
    Scaffolding levelLight To Moderate
    Hint tiers4 tiers
    Session length20–30 minutes
    Worked examplesRequired — Text-based. Child completes partial worked examples (fading). Not fully narrated.
    Feedback tonePeer Like Respectful
    Normalize struggleYes
    Example correct feedbackYou recognised that 1/2 is larger than 2/5, and used the common denominator method correctly. The visualiser confirms it — the bar for 1/2 is noticeably longer.
    Example error feedbackThe reasoning does not quite hold: you said both fractions are the same because the numerator in 2/5 is double the numerator in 1/2. But the denominator changed too — the pieces got smaller. Converting to tenths: 1/2 = 5/10 and 2/5 = 4/10. Which is larger now?


    Knowledge organiser

    Key terms:
  • friction
  • force
  • contact force
  • surface
  • fair test
  • variable
  • conclusion
  • Core facts (expected standard):
  • Contact and Non-Contact Forces: Explaining the difference between contact and non-contact forces with multiple examples, and understanding that forces can be measured using a force meter (Newtons).

  • Graph context

    Node type: ScienceEnquiry | Study ID: SE-KS2-001 Concept IDs:
  • SC-KS2-C025: Contact and Non-Contact Forces (primary)
  • SC-KS2-C027: Friction and Movement on Surfaces
  • Cypher query:

    ``cypher

    MATCH (ts:ScienceEnquiry {enquiry_id: 'SE-KS2-001'})

    -[:DELIVERS_VIA]->(c:Concept)

    -[:HAS_DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]->(dl)

    RETURN c.name, dl.label, dl.description

    ``


    Generated from the UK Curriculum Knowledge Graph — zero LLM generation.